Tuesday 18 November 2014

Post 22--Aboriginal Transparency



Pos

In the previous blog I  promised—there’s that word again!—that I would explain what I meant that Caucasians are not the only ones to oppress Aboriginals.  Aboriginals themselves oppress each other, at least, occasionally. The Vancouver Sun (VS) of November 5 & 7, 2014, featured some articles alleging an Aboriginal chief’s mischievous financial management at the expense of his own people. I refer you to:

“Family at centre of pay firestorm…,”  Nov. 5.
“Reserve life out of step…,” Nov. 7.

According to the VS, the chief of a very small community, smaller than my extended family—the band has 267 members, of whom a mere 87 live on the reserve--, takes home $200,000 a year, while his subjects live in poverty and hardship, without any development taking place in the reserve. The chief is not the only one: The CEO of the band’s corporation has earned an average of $536,000 in the past five years.  

Though this may be an extreme case, it is not unusual. I have many reports like it in my files. Not only that, but during my RV travels through BC, including the north, I have several times had Aboriginals complain to me about such chiefly mischief.  The communities are not getting their share in terms of development. For this reason, the Federal Government has passed a law demanding transparency. Fair enough, you would think. Who could possibly oppose such a move?

Would you believe it that Canada’s opposition parties oppose this move? I cannot imagine that!  That’s a requirement for all government spending at all levels!  Aboriginals have their own defenders of the situation. The VS reports that Edin Robinson, a prominent Aboriginal writer, objects because chiefs are in effect asked “to prove they aren’t liars and cheat.”!  Well, is that so bad? Isn’t that the point of disclosure? We all know the temptations public money represents for those responsible for it. Aboriginal chiefs are no exception: They are as human as the rest of us! So, Robinson is right on. 

Of course, the real reason for resistance to transparency is all too transparent. The scandalously high salaries of a few elites ruling a community smaller than my extended family are totally indefensible, especially in view of the conditions of poverty and neglect that prevail on the reserve. It cannot stand up to the light of transparency.  

The stated reason for the scandalously high salaries—higher even than that of our Prime Minister and Premier!—is that it goes counter to Shuswap culture. That may be true to a degree, but such traditions have developed under conditions of trust, fairness and equality. When those conditions no longer hold, it is time for serious review. The source culture of that money, Canadian taxpayers, does demand transparency.

I recently attended a lecture in a local church where the speaker, while claiming not to be defending such practices, tried to explain that there is a story behind the news that the media do not tell. That story is that most reserve chiefs and managers are in office for only a few years. This is their one and only chance to lift themselves out of their life-long poverty. So, they take advantage of it. I have lived in Nigeria, where this same story unfolds at every level of government with the result that 80% of Nigerians are poor in spite of the country’s oil income. Yes, the story is quite understood, but it is no excuse.
 
I am not sure who is responsible for this situation. I believe it is a long succession of Governments that have allowed it to develop. I praise our present Government for trying to stem this scandalous situation and am deeply offended by the parties who opposed this demand for transparency. 

(I have submitted another version of this post in the form of a letter to the VS editor.) Am still waiting to see whether it will be published.)

No comments:

Post a Comment