A Peek Behind the Scenes
You may be wondering how I
choose my subjects for these posts. It may seem to you that I move from pillar
to post without any obvious rational. To some degree that’s true. I do not have
a well worked out schedule of topics that rationally follow each other. It goes
like this. I come across a discussion or opinion during the course of my
readings and find myself reacting, “Oh, I should do a post on that subject.” Or
an important event takes place. I have a whole list of subjects waiting to be
tackled. Then, as I write on it, the subject itself calls up a related subject
that then needs attention to round off the one I am working on. And so I move
today from a WCC interfaith conference to conversion. Before I even begin writing
on it, the subject has already led to a consideration to, of all things, total
depravity for a next post. And so it
goes. If I’ve made you curious, then I’ve succeeded!
Conversion among Religions
So, conversion. In the light
of the above paragraph it will not be difficult for you to understand why I
take on that subject. That conference called on all the faithful of all
religions to do away with their “obsession” with conversion. That decision is not difficult to follow for
some Eastern religions or Judaism and others, for those are not traditionally missionary
religions. They are more like tribal religions that are restricted to and
identified with one distinct people, like the Jews. Or they may largely be
concentrated in one geographical region like Hindus and Buddhists.
My Christian reading of the
Old Testament (OT) makes me wonder why Judaism is not a missionary religion. I
read in the OT that God’s plan for Israel was temporarily to focus on Abraham’s offspring. But the long-range
plan was for Abraham’s seed to become a blessing to the entire world. Well, don’t
have the space to treat this more extensively. The last half century, Buddhism,
one of the Eastern religions, has become quite active in the West, not only
following its immigrant adherents, but finding ready soil among fall-outs from
either Christianity or secularism. For these and other non-missionary
religions, it is not difficult to follow the demand to drop the obsession to
convert. They never had it to begin with, except then this recent exception.
Conversion in Islam--No/Yes
Two religions that are
particularly missionary minded both in theory and practice are Christianity and
Islam. For these two religions, a call to drop their “obsession” with conversion
amounts to considering the religions themselves as “obsessions,” for their
missionary character is part of their core or essence. You take away this
missionary thrust and you end up with a stultified version no longer true to
its deepest core.
I can somewhat understand
Muslim leaders signing on to this declaration. They do not talk of conversion
so much as reversion, that is a coming back, a coming home. That is to say, to them everyone is by nature
and by birth a Muslim. When a person leaves another religion to become a
Muslim, he does not convert but revert. She returns to what is the created
natural religion; she returns home where she belongs. Secondly, calling people
back to Islam, though a drive deep within the religion, is also considered a
natural pose. Of course, you want people to become Islam. That’s not an
obsession; that’s the best thing you have in mind for them, the greatest gift
one can offer to your neighbor or entire nation. So, when Muslims sign on to
such a document, they are thinking not of themselves but of Christians with
their aggressive missionary approach. When they sign but nevertheless continue
to preach their gospel, to Christians that seems like duplicity and hypocrisy.
Not so to Muslims. They merely do what comes and is natural. According to
Muslims, it is Christians who are doing the unnatural, which thus amounts to an
obsession.
However, when Muslims are busy urging folks to "revert," to other religions they are converting, while they pledged to quit. It's one of the many reasons people tend to mistrust the words of Muslim leaders.
Concluding Remarks
Well, too late in this post
to start talking about this Christian and, as other people see it, Muslim “obsession,” even though I have not yet
reached the quota of 750 words. But I’ll let it go for now and come back to the
subject in the next post. This implies
that the subject of “total depravity” will be pushed ahead one slot. I think you can live with that, for it is not
a very pleasant subject! No one is eager to think about that subject, let alone
talk about it! BBBRRRR! How awful!
No comments:
Post a Comment