Showing posts with label Christianity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christianity. Show all posts

Wednesday, 27 July 2016

Post 120--Secular Missionaries of Democracy

Promises, Promises!
Well, here I go breaking the promise I long ago promised I would not break! Once you’re into a promise-breaking mode, you may as well go at it, right?   And here’s one more: I will no longer pretend I can write blogs or anything else without both making and then breaking promises I just made. I’m simply going to make one whenever the need arises without any guilt feeling.  Making promises is definitely an inescapable part of the human condition; breaking promises is not far from that one!
Secular Missionaries
In the second to the last paragraph of Post 119 I noted that Western nations export their wild electioneering campaigns to non-Western nations. The term “export” in this context is really a secular term for “missionizing.”  Yes, Western nations and their people, secular as they tend to be and as disapproving most of them are of missionaries, are themselves missionaries in the sense that they seek to convince the peoples of other regions to adopt their democratic ways of electing their governments. Secularists are missionaries, short and simple, though they do not recognize it and will vehemently deny it when confronted with it. This denial is based on the fact that they are blind to their own faith or worldview.
Secular Democratic Imposition
I have met a young lady hardly beyond her mid-twenties, who was commissioned by the US Government to teach democratic ways to African politicians. Though she was sweet enough, I was shocked to think that such an inexperienced person would have the gall to travel all over Africa to recommend, among other things, the “art” of political campaigning. I was shocked even more by the fact that she was actually commissioned to do so by the sophisticated US Government! What brazen imposition! What a brazen superiority complex—a youthful American teaching African leaders the ways of American political campaigns?  Please reread some of the paragraphs of Post 119. Would you even think about exporting those ways? And please remember, much of the same holds true for Canada as well.
Christian Electioneering Shenanigans
Well, the West has been most successful in their political mission to Africa. In my book Christians and Muslims: Parameters for Living Together I describe a situation in central Nigeria where three contenders for the position of State Governor all belonged to one and the same Christian denomination.  Officially, these contenders were brothers in Christ.  They were all taught human relations from a Christian perspective—love, mutual respect, dignity, speaking the truth, etc. etc., but none of this came through in the course of their campaign. Like those in Post 119, “they fought with each other like everyone else, berated each other, accused each other; lied to and about each other.” It’s too bad I cannot give you more juicy details, the reason being that the documents underlying my statements were deposited in a Yale archive. In short, they made mince meat of everything the Bible teaches in terms of positive human relations. And they all thought of themselves as Christian gentlemen! (The full text of that book is available on the Islamica page of my website <  www.SocialTheology.com  >, vol. 8-2, p. 144.)
I do hope the above paragraph will not make you think me racist.  After all, I say much worse things about American politicians. I should correct this last statement. I don’t say worse things about American politicians so much as more grimy details.  Those documents now at Yale contain similar grimy details about these Nigerian politicians.
The Disconnect
How is it possible that these prominent American politicians, some of them icons of US history and at least some of them Christians, could so defame and defile the name of their most prominent citizens and not be called on it, at least, not enough for them to cease the practice?  And how is the same thing possible with Nigerian Christian politicians?  How could they square such behavior with the Bible and their religion?  Probably the dominant reason is the disconnect between their official religion—Christianity—and their actions.
Dualism
A major theme in all my writings is “dualism,” that is, separation not of church from state, but of religion from state as well as religion from politics. The way missionaries in Africa brought the Gospel has lead to Africans disconnecting these pairs. Though many missionaries did not actively reject ties between these two entities, their failure to encourage building ties between religion and both state and politics led to a separation. The result is the attitude of religion is religion; business is business; politics is politics-- and never the twain shall meet, the “twain” being religion on the one side and business & politics on the other.
Secular Intolerance
Of course we Canadians have only recently suffered the same electioneering shenanigans for the same reason. In our country secularism has achieved such a majority position that the very idea that religion should be out there in the halls of power and in the market place is considered plain primitive and uncivilized. A current example is the legal battle over the proposed law school at Western Trinity University right here in BC.  It’s a pure example of secularism’s viciousness and intolerance.  But, hey, that’s how the establishment mind operates, whether it’s Islam or secularism—or Christian even.  But don’t let that intimidate you, for that secularism is so ignorant that it does not know itself.
The Gospel Alternative: Love and Respect

The bottom Christian line in all this is the plain Gospel recommendation—no, more than recommendation: demand,  prescription—that we love and respect one another, build up each other, the very opposite of our current culture of berating and destroying.  

Saturday, 9 July 2016

Post 117--Neo-Calvinism and Islam


This is a post with a difference. Well, actually every  post is unique, but this one is "more unique" than any other so far on this blog, the only one of its kind. It is an announcement of a conference that lies very close to my heart.  I am one of those Neo-Calvinists and I have published almost profusely as a Neo-Calvinist on Islam in Nigeria. So, I cannot resist the temptation to share this info with you. I only wish I had found out about it in time. I might have foregone our trip to The Netherlands I have told you about in the last two posts and used that travel budget to get me to Istanbul. Alas!  Money gone!

But here's the info anyhow. Perhaps some of you have the dough to fly there and attend. If you do, share your conference experience with me, please. If you wish, you should write it in a style that can be used on this blog and I will publish your report or comments.

                                                                          ===========


                                                        ANOTHER RELIGION? 

                                     Neo-Calvinism and  Islam 

                                                        at

                             Istanbul, Turkey 25-56 August, 2016 

 Theme: At the end of the nineteenth century, military and economic expansion in Africa, the Middle East and Asia brought Europe into contact with Islam. This interaction sparked European political debates on how to deal with different religions and cultures. 

The study of Islam was encouraged within the contexts of missiology and the science of religion, and missionaries were sent to the Arab world. A range of opinions on Islam within emerged within European Christianity, varying from a comparative view to radical rejection, from the need for conversion to the search for dialogue. 

The late nineteenth century was also the context for the development of neo-Calvinism: a movement that attempted to articulate an orthodox Reformed faith in the modern world. Which views of Islam were held amongst neo-Calvinist theologians, missiologists, missionaries and politicians? How did these views work out in the encounter with Islam? 

The conference will focus on the theological, ecclesial, philosophical, political, historical, social and cultural interactions between the two religions: in what ways did they approach each other? On which aspects did they continue to differ, and why? How could their relationship over a century and a half best be described? 

Plenary speakers-- Among others: 
             Prof. George Harinck, Theological University Kampen                    Prof. Kees van der Kooi, VU University Amsterdam 
             Prof. Richard J. Mouw, Fuller Theological Seminary,                               Pasadena 

Call for Papers--The conference organisers welcome proposals for short papers. Proposals (approximately 300 words) should be sent to g.harinck@vu.nl by April 30th, 2016. Conference papers will be in English. 

Registration-- The conference registration fee is €100, which includes two lunches and drinks. Conference places must be reserved by email (g.harinck@vu.nl) by May 30th, 2016. 

Location and Accommodation--  Participants are responsible for finding their own accommodation. 

The conference will be held on invitation of the Deputy Consul General of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Istanbul at: Palais de Hollande Consulate General of the Kingdom of the Netherlands Istiklal Caddesi 197, Beyoğlu, Istanbul Turkey 

Host Institutions: 
      Historical Documentation Centre, VU University, Amsterdam         New College, University of Edinburgh 
      Kampen Theological University Archive and Documentation                 Centre, Kampen

Sunday, 20 March 2016

Post 100—Conversion in Islam


Though Muslims, as I explained in Post 99, use the term “reversion” for anyone converting to Islam, call it what they may, others, including myself, consider it “conversion” plain and simple. So, our topic for today is the place of conversion in these two religions, which is not quite the same as defining the term, for they do not quite mean the same thing in the two religions.
Conversion is, of course, usually the result of a mission or evangelistic outreach by a Muslim or Christian, whether individual or organization, to another individual or community, usually with the explicit goal to bring someone or a community to conversion.  I say “usually.” It does not always come about that way. For example, many are the Muslims throughout the world who dream of a person dressed in a white robe who invites them to come to Him, who is often then identified as Jesus. Thousands of Muslims the world over have such dreams and they usually end up in accepting His invitation. There are entire books written about this kind of conversion invitation. These are not the result of any human outreach or other effort and certainly not of any “obsession” that WCC talked about in Post 98.
 There are indeed forms or styles of mission outreach to convert that are objectionable to people who do not adhere to the religion practicing it but that are usually perfectly acceptable to the adherents themselves. Muslims often quote the Qur’an that says there is to be no compulsion in religion, but they employ all kinds of compulsion and force. You ought to read the Christian volumes of my Studies in Christian-Muslim Relations to see how frequently Muslims use force to “revert” people to Islam according to Christian complaints (www.SocialTheology.com/islamica, volumes 3, 5 and 7).                                                 
Allow me one example from Nigeria. A Nigerian pastor friend of mine borrowed money from the government to establish a chicken farm. He was not able to keep up with the payment schedule and ran the risk of losing his business along with his investment. Christians did not offer to help him out with loans. When the Muslim community heard about this, they offered to pay his entire debt provided he become Muslim. Being desperate, my friend accepted and became Muslim. This has been years ago and he has not changed his mind ever since. The moment he does change his mind and returns to Christ, the Muslim community will demand repayment and, failing to come through, he will be hauled to court. (For the full story see our memoirs Every Square Inch, vol. 2, pp. 59-62 on our website < www.SocialTheology.com/boeriana >).  If that is not force, I don’t know what you call it. And if that is not a contradiction to that earlier statement about no force in religion, I don’t know what that is either.
However, you must be careful about accusing a religion not your own of contradiction, for I find that when non-Christians accuse us of contradictions, it is usually due to ignorance or, using more gentle language, misunderstanding. It is easy for us to fall into the same trap with respect to Islam. The above story is typical, not an exception. Muslims use both the stick and the carrot methods to induce “reversions” in all kinds of ways. As I said above, read my series and you’ll find a dizzying range of variations of force and “tricks” on their part. Another clever way is to surround a Christian business with such stiff competition that the owner either becomes a Muslim or closes his business—all perfectly legal!  And on and on and on…. Muslim authorities all over the world are known to create legal demands and restrictions on the Christian community with respect to registration of churches and building permits.  We have arrived at the border here between persecution and a campaign to “revert.” It’s a very thin line and it all smells of compulsion, even if called “reversion.” Word juggling does not change all of reality!
But do understand the Muslim position. If you are convinced that being a Muslim is the greatest gift you can wish for a person, then such tactics may seem minor in comparison to the magnificent gift they turn into. After all, adults punish wayward children in love for their own good.  An adult non-Muslim may not be a child, but she is in a state of jahiliya, an Arabized Hausa word for “ignorance.” She doesn’t really know what she is doing. A little push in the right direction seems a small price to pay for the end result that can only be described as magnificent. My experience in Nigeria as I record it in my series is that Muslims just don’t comprehend why not everyone wants to become a Muslim. What greater good can you possibly imagine for yourself?
So, they really are obsessed by wanting to con—or revert everyone, but that’s a good obsession and not a negative you would ever think about giving up on.  However, when someone is obsessed about trying to convert his neighbor or community to another religion, say Christianity, well, yes, such an obsession is unhealthy and must be let go. And so Muslims signed that declaration in all seriousness and good faith. To adherents of other religions this may seem like duplicity and hypocrisy; to a Muslim it is the only way to go. You have to think yourself into the other’s skin in order to understand correctly and not judge wrongly. 

In other words, to expect Muslims to give up on conversion is to ask them to give up on a core component of their religion.  That is not what the WCC conference that published the declaration expected of any religion.  The religions were not expected to surrender any part of their core; they were to remain true to themselves. Whether the declaration and the expectation can co-exist, is another question. 

Tuesday, 30 June 2015

Post 55—Wasting Water: A Precious Resource




Spent part of yesterday at Derby Reach, a park on the Fraser River near Langley BC. There were many shrieking happy children voices as they ran around innocently playing their games without any thought of the potential effect or ramifications of their games. Well, of course not. Who would expect such concerns from happy playing children?

There was a water faucet nearby that was difficult to open, but once opened it spurted out water with great gusto, obviously under great pressure down below. There is probably only one activity that children playing in a river-side park like better than water faucets—throwing stones in the river’s water. We were not disappointed on either count. Many were the stones that ended up in the river and many were the gallons of water the children managed to squeeze out of that stubborn faucet and promptly dumped on the grass a few feet away—all evening. Perhaps we should have counted the gallons.  Water a precious resource as some claim? You’d never know from these children—or from their “supervising” parents who did nothing to stop the “innocent” play. 

It’s hard, if not harsh, to criticize children playing their innocent games.  I love watching them go through their antics.  So much fun; so much joy; so much innocence.  No, I won’t criticize them, but I will criticize their parents for allowing them to waste so much water. Today this group of families; tomorrow that group—but ongoing from day to day throughout the park season.  Gallons and gallons of it without let up.  

Water a precious resource? You’d never guess that to be the case either when you drive through North America’s suburbs with their spacious lawns in the summer time. Gallons upon gallons poured out daily to keep them green, only to be mowed every few days and that beautiful grass to be mulched on a weekly basis. An entire industry has grown up to serve that culture of beauty and—waste.  Yes, waste; pure waste of a precious and diminishing resource. Almost totally mindless.

It’s not only the people in Western countries who waste water mindlessly. I have lived in communities in an African country where women have for decades and even centuries had to daily haul water from distant places to cook and clean.  Usually on their heads; sometimes on shoulder or back. It was an unending and tormenting task without ever a break.  I have rejoiced with them when their government would install a water system for the community.  

You’d think that after life-long scarcity and hard work, they would be very careful in their use of the new easy supply of water, but that is often not the case. In contrast to the past where they rationed it carefully, they will often leave the faucets open and running when no one is around to catch the water. I’ve been amazed to see this. Just like the playing children and the law sprinklers above, they seem to think the supply is endless. They just let it run on and on and on….  Almost totally mindless. 

If you keep up with the news, you will know that in the US desert state of California, drought has set in with a vengeance, severely impacting the cost of food not only for the local people but throughout the US and even Canada. As we speak, I watch the price of food in Vancouver BC climb and climb and wonder when it will settle down. The question for all of us, not just Californians, is what can be done about it?  Where will it end?  Do we even have the gumption to address it?  Can a government that wants to address it seriously by restricting access in some way even survive?  

It’s a topic I plan to address off and on. I hope to occasionally describe various plans that are being offered to rescue the situation and the people’s reaction to them. What motivations might be needed for people to become more careful in their use of this precious resource?  Could financial incentives bring a change in behaviour? Perhaps water comes too cheap for us to bother?

As to myself, I have an in-built water restraint: my Christian faith.  I don’t need a financial incentive to reduce my water consumption. I am very conscious of the very first command in the Bible that instructs us to manage well the garden God has bequeathed us. This demands that as the supply diminishes, we devise more economical ways to use it. It demands an end to mindless or selfish wastage. And if nothing else, having experienced those African situations, every time I observe wastage, whether water or anything else, I get nervous.  That experience should be enough for anyone. 

So, this post is an example of  the previous post: the Biblical tradition of mixing religion with the “secular” things of this world. They cannot be separated, for your faith, whatever it is, will always influence your response to these situations. Check yourself. What would be at the bottom of any attempt of yours to convince you to change you wasteful habits?  You will find there is always some value system or belief that underlies your response. If you’re a Christian, the previous paragraph should be part of your motivation and that should be stronger than any financial considerations, though they also have a legitimate part in all of this.