We live in one world and, according to the teachings of Jesus Christ, every world citizen is my neighbour. That means I am to be concerned about every one. Not only concerned, but to love them and to want the very best for them. So, in this blog, I write about neighbours and social issues, often by bringing in someone else's writing and then commenting on it from my Christian point of few.
Monday, 31 October 2016
Post 134--A Rose by Any Other Name
Remember the cold I suffered
last week? Well, it ain’t over yet. It still has me down and out, something
that has hardly ever happened to me. I get one about once a year; it comes and
goes quickly and I’m my old self again. Not this time. But I don’t want you to
think I’m slacking off. So, another postponement of the third prostitution post
and, instead, an easy one that will not take a lot of stamina on my part.
I utilize two prepared
documents laying on my desk and I will use some of each. They both report on
various situations of persecution. When we think of persecution, we often think
of Muslim persecution of Christians and others. Well, that will be one side
today. The other side, however, may well surprise you…but let me keep you in
suspense for a few more moments. Just
remember Shakespeare’s adage above.
Persecution may come in very different forms and from very different
quarters, but it’s still persecution. So, though today’s info will not take
much stamina from my reduced stock, it does weigh heavily in me and carrying
such burdens takes another form of stamina.
First, a few items of
Christians under Muslim persecution—a few from what could take up innumerable
tomes, believe me. These are reported by
BarnabasAid, a UK ministry to persecuted Christians all over the world.
Aasia Bibi languishes on
death row in Pakistan for years on basis of totally false accusations of
blasphemy, a tool used frequently by Pakistani Muslims to take revenge for
personal reasons. Check out her name on
the Internet! In that same country, “Christian
girls and women are kidnapped by Muslim men, raped, forcibly converted to Islam
and forcibly married to Muslims. Of course that happens in many Muslim
countries. Another Pakistani situation is that of bonded Christian laborers in
brick kilns. They cannot escape the grueling work for substandard pay. Their cruel
bosses trick and exploit them, keeping them in permanent debt. Some Christian
children are even held as slaves.
21 brave Christian migrant
workers in Libya refused to deny Christ. They will killed by ISIS militants. If
I were more computer savvy, I would reproduce a picture of all of them on their
knees in orange outfits with masked militants standing behind them, poised to
kill them momentarily.
Ugandan pastor, Umar
Mulinde, is a convert from Islam. Muslims three acid in his face. He was
terribly burned and lost one eye, but he continues to evangelize and preach boldly.
Nissar Hussain and his wife,
from Bradford in the UK, are condemned as apostates. They and their children
are persecuted for following Christ. Their home was burned to the ground. Their
car was attacked. Nissar was beaten up and hospitalized. Falsely accused to the
police, he was detained in a cell for many hours. The same thing happened to
his wife. Rejected by church, law enforcement, and society, they continue to
follow Christ. They can no longer live in Bradford. Yes, in the UK—and this is
by no means the only incident in that country.
And now a totally different
scene that at first sight you might not dub “persecution,” but remember that
adage…. This time the persecutor is no one less than the US government, and not
about religion this time, but about science they don’t like. The following is a
long quote:
Picture
being an an award-winning scientist -- you've just published your latest
findings. And then your government tries to stop you speaking about your
research. And when you
refuse, you're suspended -- then fired. That's
exactly what happened to Jonathan after he discovered a link between bee die-offs
and bee-killing pesticides. Now he’s attempting to continue his research in the private sector, and the USDA is STILL harassing him by blacklisting him from USDA-funded research grants and pressuring other scientists to not collaborate with him. It’s time for the USDA to end their attacks on scientific freedom. The U.S. Department of Agriculture is notoriously friendly with giant corporate agribusinesses, and lobbyists for big pesticide companies like Monsanto and Bayer don’t want government researchers looking into the impact of bee-killing pesticides. But rarely have we seen such a blatant and ongoing assault on scientific freedom, even at the USDA. SumOfUs members have donated tens of thousands of dollars to help our friends at Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) defend Dr. Lundgren. With our help, Dr. Lundgren has fought back by filing a whistleblower complaint, a scientific integrity complaint, and a federal lawsuit. Dr. Lundgren’s case has gotten enormous press coverage, and he was personally honored with the Joe A. Calloway Award for Civic Courage—a prestigious award for public-interest activism. But the USDA continues to harass Dr. Lundgren, and as long as that continues, it’s sending a chilling effect to researchers everywhere. That’s why we must continue to fight for his right to conduct research freely, without lobbyist interference or government censorship. A rose by any other name…. |
Labels:
BarnabasAid,
Bayer,
bees,
Bibi Aasia,
blasphemy,
freedom,
Hussain Nissar,
ISIS,
Libya,
Lundgren Jonathan,
Monsanto,
Mulinde Umar,
Pakistan,
Persecution,
pesticide,
science,
UK,
USDA,
whistleblower
Friday, 28 October 2016
Post 133—Public Funds for Private Schools
My intention for this post
was to finish my mini-series in prostitution. Alas, it’s been almost two weeks
since I did the second in the series. The reason for this long gap is that I’ve
had a rough time, what with a surgical procedure topped up with a simultaneous
bad cold. Since I am not exactly at home in the world of prostitution and need
to do some serious thinking before I write the 3rd in the series, I
just don’t have the mental stamina for that. Instead, I will write a
post on a subject matter more familiar to me and get back to that series when
my mental stamina is up to it, hopefully next week.
The other day, one of my
favourite Vancouver Sun columnists,
Pete McMartin, blew it as far as I am concerned. He inveighed against private
schools. His main emphasis was on the private elite schools but also referred
to religious schools. Here’s the URL for the article, in case you want to read
it yourself: http://vancouversun.com/opinion/columnists/pete-mcmartin-this-is-egalitarian-canada-so-why-should-private-schools-get-public-money.
I am going to focus on the
religious schools. I sent the following letter to the editor, but doubt it will
be published, since they have already published three others on the subject.
So, you are invited to read a rejected letter!
Sorry. Here goes, two paragraphs in all:
“Oh, no, not again! More secular dribble
about private vs public schools!
McMartin’s (22-10-2016) is a sorry case of secular blindness. Canada is
a multi-cultural/religious country, where every religion is supposed to have
the freedom to express itself. However secularism insists on defining these
religions as private/personal affairs, which they are not and never have been.
Secularism thinks it has a monopoly on reason and operates from a neutral
platform, both of which are delusions. Religious people want their kind of
school as much as McMartin wants his. Imposing his kind on the rest of us is
nothing short of discrimination and oppression. We’ve rejected the de facto Anglican monopoly on education
in BC long ago and have replaced it with secular monopoly, exchanged one public
worldview monopoly for another. Secularism is now the de facto establishment worldview, while it pretends we have no
favourite establishment! Nice try!
“The only neutral arrangement is for
disestablishment of secular schools in favour of equal funding for all schools
that meet the basic provincial educational standards. But that would require
secularists to open their eyes, know themselves and admit to the belief system
underlying their faith in naked reason—a far cry!”
Now that letter contains nothing new. The
same sentiments have been expressed thousands of times in defence of Christian
schools. A hefty book has even been written about the struggle for public
funding and the purpose of such schools in BC, but my secular friends,
including Pete, seem to have deaf ears. The arguments for such schools are
clear, rational, cogent, fair, etc. etc., but they run up against the
rationalistic wall secularists have built around themselves. Trump could learn
a lesson or two from them about effective walls; they are not brick and mortar;
they are ways of thinking in which people imprison themselves.
As Christians, we know the
core of our belief. It centers on Christ and then goes on from
there. You take out Christ, and the whole thing collapses. Something similar is
true for secularists. Among their core beliefs—and it is a belief, not an established or proven fact—is that their
perspective is the only rational and neutral one; all others, whether religious
or not, are subjective and irrational. That being the case, the only rational
and neutral thing to do is to educate our kids within that framework. The
objective and rational argument against that position is that, since it has not
ever been proved and never will, it, too, is a belief system at the same level
as that of the religious. So what is so neutral about it? There ain’t—and Pete
and his cohorts better begin to realize that and quit living by their mythical
delusion.
But that would exact a heavy price. You take
Jesus out of Christianity and you’re left with a blank. You take the sense of a
neutral and objective rationalism out of secularism, and they’r stranded, also
left with a blank, without any further arguments. That price may be too
difficult to pay.
Religious people do not demand
that secularists give up their faith; they have a right to it. They just demand
that secularism recognize the same right for believers without imposing theirs on
the latter.
Believers, did I say? Yes. We’re all believers, secularists as well
as the rest of us. We all believe in the core of our worldview or
philosophy or belief, whatever you want to call it. Secularists, including
Pete, you’re welcome into the company of believers! You are one of us—you believe! Now quit pestering us and acknowledge our
equal right!
Labels:
belief,
establishment,
McMartin,
neutral,
rational(ism),
schools private,
schools public,
secularism
Thursday, 20 October 2016
Post 132--Biblical Attitude towards Prostitution (1)
The Bible was written in a
world where prostitution and other sexual practices were common. Prostitution
is a very ancient practice. It is not
dubbed the oldest profession by some for nothing. By Genesis 38 it was already
an established custom that served various purposes and vested interests. Female
slaves were offering up their bodies to earn money for their masters. Free
women entered it as profession, for so it was regarded. Brothels were not
uncommon (I Kings 3:16).
Some decades ago, Amsterdam,
the capital of my “old country,” was lauded for its progressive attitude
towards prostitution, for they regulated it, derived taxes from it and sought
to reduce the health problems that usually attend to its practice. Licenses
were required from houses of prostitution with the government deriving revenue
from it. This was sort of a win-win situation, sort of, probably better than the usual unregulated conditions. But
this is nothing new, for similar arrangements have been discovered in the
ancient world.
So, a whole culture had
developed around the practice that is well circumscribed throughout the Old
Testament (OT) especially. Prostitutes might wear special clothing, even
perhaps a veil (Genesis 38:14ff; Proverbs 7:10). Of course, the price would
vary depending on circumstances and social status. We read of a loaf of bread (Proverbs 6:26); a
kid (Genesis 38:17); a boy could be given away for a harlot’s wage (Joel 3:3;
Matthew 4:3). Hebrew father was not to give his daughter to it (Lev 19:29). Nor could priests marry a prostitute
So, ancient, firmly
established and commonly practiced. If you want a fuller dose of it, I would
refer you to volumes 1 and 2 of the International
Standard Bible Enclopedia—1982 edition by Eerdmans—volume 1, pp. 815-817; volume
2, pp. 616-617.
Though when we think of
prostitution, we usually think in terms of women selling their bodies to men,
those we dub the “johns.” But in the
world of the OT it seems that male prostitution was as common as the female
version. And besides the blatantly commercial version, there was a lot of
religion involved in terms of cultic prostitution, including temples. The cultic in this context does not refer to
some extreme version but of mainstream or mainline practice. Prostitution was
often closely tied to religion, the opposite of what we might expect. In fact,
most of the OT passages dealing with the subject are tied to its cultic
practice, though not exclusively.
So, when the Bible speaks of
prostitution, it is not talking about some exotic realm practiced in the
shadows. No, much of it was in the open and official, both recognized and approved
by the dominant cultures around Israel; in the centre of things instead of in
the shadows, not on skidrow as in Vancouver’s Down Town East Side, but on
Georgia and Robson Streets and in the churches lining West End streets.
But one of the first things
you will notice when you begin searching for the topic in the Bible is its strongly
negative attitude towards prostitution. It does not have a single good word to
say about it. There are various reasons for that attitude; it’s not just a
matter of “kill joy.” In fact, the very
opposite; it’s more a matter of “enable joy,” real joy. It led—and still leads—to so many ugly
problems in society that God wanted to protect His people from this “kill joy.” Probably the first reason was of a religious
nature, since religion is always at the heart of every society—the cult
prostitution. "None of the daughters of Israel shall be a cult prostitute, nor shall any of the sons of Israel be a cult prostitute
(Deuteronomy 23:17). The
next verse: "You
shall not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog into the house of
the LORD your God for any votive offering, for both of these are an abomination to the LORD your God.…” “There were also male cult prostitutes in the
land. They did according to all the abominations of the nations which the LORD
dispossessed before the sons of Israel (1 Kings 14:24). The cultic practice was
an abomination to God because it was a common Pagan practice among the nations
around Israel that constantly tempted the people to follow their example, have
their “fun” and gradually transfer their loyalty from the God who delivered
them from slavery in Egypt to the numerous idols of their neighbours. These
were false “gods” that the OT frequently pokes fun of as powerless and of being
made of mere wood or stone. These so-called “gods” deceived them, brought them
false hope and distorted their values. They represented a culture rejected by
God because of all its corruption, cruelties and oppressions. It was hard for God to protect them when the
people themselves were so open to and tempted by these cultural and religious
travesties. And so God tried to put a stop to it altogether by simply
condemning it in no uncertain language.
There was another but related reason for the negative attitude towards prostitution. It
can lead to social and cultural breakdown, even apart from the religious angle,
but time is up and the word limit has been crossed. So, that will mean another
post on the subject. See you in 133.
Labels:
abomination,
Amsterdam,
Bible,
idol(atry),
johns,
legalization,
Old Testament,
Pagans,
prostitution,
prostitution cult(ic),
religion,
veil
Saturday, 15 October 2016
Post 131—Prostitution: Further Ruminations
Rehabbing Prostitute Culture
So the City Fathers of
Vancouver decided the reputation of former West End (WE) prostitutes needed to
be rehabbed. (See Post 130.) Did they consult with us WE residents at all? They
may have, but I certainly never heard of such an event, while I usually try to
keep on top of such happenings. Such consultations are usually well advertised
far ahead of time. I must admit, of course, that I do travel a lot and thus
might miss some of these occasions.
Lack of Citizen Involvement
But were there any cries
from the current residents that a former injustice had to be undone? Was the city under local pressure on this
matter? Even if I missed out on whatever
public consultations might have taken place, I have noticed nothing of public
pressure to restore the honour of prostitutes, let alone thank them for their
historic contribution to advancing our “progressive” WE culture. I am sociable;
I spend time on the street; I drink tea on the new plaza in front of our
building. I heard no such discussion of any kind. It seems the City Fathers
just quietly slipped this one over us, possibly alerting some citizen groups
they would expect to support such a move, but almost definitely no general
public consultation. Though St. Paul’s Anglican Church participated in and approved
of the action, I doubt that other area churches such as my church, the large
Baptist “cathedral” at Burrard and Nelson, was consulted, or the Guardian Angel
Catholic Church on Broughton. Possibly St. Andrews United, for they could be expected
to support the move and, perhaps, the Presbyterians.
Citizen Reactions
As could be expected,
citizen reactions ran the full gamut from warm embrace to vigorous rejection. One
Derek Frew wrote that he initially thought it a case of “blasphemy” that “involved…placing
a monument to paganism in front of a Christian church.” But then he had second
thoughts urged on him by words attributed to the famous writer G. K.
Chesterton: “Every man who knocks on the door of a brothel is looking for God.”
Frew concluded that “perhaps not a bad place for it after all” ! (Vancouver Sun, Sept 20, 2016, p. A11). If nothing else, his has at least a humorous
touch to it.
The Earlier Part of the Story
From the other side of the
opinion track, we get Ray McNabb’s piece on the same VS page under the title “Memorial
to sex workers a wrong-headed affront.” He’s
lived in the WE for 40 years and has always found it “a wonderful area to live
in. However, I vividly recall a time when it wasn’t.” That time was the early
1970s when there was so much traffic that he could hardly get onto the street.
There was a constant lot of “noise, car horns, car radios booming, shouting,
swearing from the traffic. The cars were all headed for Davie Street, where the
prostitutes all gathered. Bumper to bumper stuff. Some WE-enders organized a “Shame
the Johns” movement. “We were upset and annoyed with the lack of action by the
police and city hall….” A pressure group
of citizens, including some politicians, finally was heard and the “court
ordered the…hookers out of the WE.”
Traffic was forced away from the regular tours by a mini-park on Jervis
and a cul-de-sac at Bute & Burnaby, right in front of my building here. The
neighbourhood slowly “returned to normal.”
Then and Now
So, that time there was public pressure on the authorities
to stop the sex trade in the WE. The residents did not want it. It ruined their
lives and turned the area into a noisy and chaotic place. Davie village became
so infamous that even in Africa,
where I lived at the time, I heard about it, just like today the place is world
famous for its gay-friendly culture
so that gay people from all over the world gather in the WE to participate in
the annual week-long activities that culminate in the huge local gay parade.
But notice the difference: infamous vs
famous. At that time it was the laughing stock of the province, nation and even
world!
An Affront
And now, McNabb rightly
complains that city Counselor Andrea Reimer, judging from the name, a
descendant of that morally pristine Mennonite community, refers to the citizens’
action in the 70s as “a tragic injustice.”
Oh, yeah? How about opening up space for that crowd on her street and see if she would still
feel that way! Her neighbours would likely drive her out with the rest of the crowd to follow! If not worse!
“What an affront!” comments McNabb. “She lost my vote”—and mine as well.
I am coming close to dubbing her an “idiot!” Again, something like calling a spade a spade.
The Next Post
I hope to have the time to
prepare for the next post to deal with the more overtly Christian perspective
on the issue. You will learn that I do not see it all in black and white terms.
My prostitute story in Post 130 is illustrative of the tragic circumstances
that can drive a person into prostitution. I am far from judging an individual
prostitute, but that is very different from elevating the culture of
prostitution to the level of desirability to which more communities should
aspire.
Labels:
blasphemy,
churches,
citizens,
consultation,
Davie Street,
Frew Derek,
McNabb Ray,
paganism,
prostitution,
Reimer Andrea,
traffic,
West End
Friday, 7 October 2016
Post 130—Prostitution Gone Mainstream?
Out of / in Nigeria
You may remember that I
spent 30 years in Nigeria, from 1966-1996.
Even though that’s been 20 years ago now, it still seems like yesterday.
Since I left the country, I have written 13 books and many articles on my work
there, including Christian-Muslim relations and mission memoirs. Thus, though I
was physically away from Nigeria, psychologically, emotionally and mentally I
was/am still there. Even today, due to sleep apnea, I dream frequently and by
far most of my dreams are still about Nigeria.
During the course of my
ministry in Nigeria, I often traveled far and wide. One car trip I stayed
overnight in a “local” hotel, places few Caucasians frequent; we prefer
the more modern and convenient ones. I chose a local one just to see what they are like and
what goes on there. It was not a pleasant or comfortable place to stay, though much
cheaper, something that does a Dutch heart like mine good.
Hymn-singing Prostitute
Like most Nigerian hotels,
prostitutes were abundant. I overheard one of them humming and even softly
singing Christian hymns. So I screwed up my courage and asked her how she could
be singing Christian hymns while practicing prostitution. Her story broke my
heart. She was from Ghana, where she had married with two or three children.
Her husband abandoned her and her children. She tried every which way to
provide for her children but was not successful. In her wanderings she ended up
a prostitute in this Nigerian hotel. She could see no alternative.
Jesus and Prostitutes
Her story immediately
reminded me of Biblical stories about Jesus and prostitutes. Go to John
7:36-50; 8:1-11 and to Luke 7:236-50. If
you want to read further on the subject in the Bible, just google “Jesus and
prostitutes” and you’ll get a very full plate of stories and commentary on
these stories. I am an emotional person and had to work hard at containing my
emotions at her story and those about
Jesus all at once. This was the first and only time in my life that I
consciously sought out a prostitute, even if it was only to satisfy my curiosity
about her story. But the Jesus stories told me one thing very clearly: I was in
no position to judge her.
Prostitution in Vancouver
The above paragraphs form
the backdrop to this and the next post about prostitutes in my city, Vancouver,
Canada. (When you write about Vancouver, you always need to specify which
Vancouver, since there is a smaller city by that name in the south of the American
state of Washington.)
Apology to Sex Workers
On September 17, 2016, about
three weeks ago, the Vancouver Sun
featured a story on p. A16 with the heading “West End sex workers get civic
apology,” written by Glen Schaefer, with the subheading, “City unveils memorial
to trades people driven to margins during 1980s.” The article was flanked by a
picture by Ben Nelms I might have included in this article if I had the digital
know-how for it. As it is, I can only reproduce the caption underneath the
picture. It reads, “Indigenous transgender sex work activist Jamies Lee
Hamilton, left, and University of British Columbia professor Becki Ross unveil
on Friday a memorial—a retro lamp-post with a red bulb—that has been dedicated
to sex-trade workers of Vancouver’s West End Community.”
Now I live in that part of
Vancouver and do remember the stories people told me about the situation in the
West End (WE). The entire “industry” had been wiped out by the time we arrived
on the scene in 2001. We were still left with quite a contingent of homeless
folk and addicts, who were also under pressure to move out of the area, though
today they are re-invading the area with a vengeance. Had my wife and I heard
of the ceremony ahead of time, we probably would have attended it out of pure
curiosity, since it took place within three short blocks from us. On the
evening of Sept. 17, we did take a stroll there and, sure enough, there was
that new retro lamppost with clear inscriptions and a red light on top, right
in front of St. Paul’s Anglican Church. A very respectable memorial at a very
respectable residential/church location.
Reversal of Attitudes
How things have changed
during these short 15 years that we have lived in the WE. During that decade and a half the official attitude
had been turned upside down from chasing out these prostitutes—and their
clients!—to apologizing for that act! Ross,
the UBC sociology specialist in the sex trade, spoke the following:
"The early 1980s marked the full fledged anti-
prostitution crusade to purge sex workers from
the WE. Davie sex workers built the foundation of
what would become this city’s first Gay-
neighbourhood, and yet hookers on Davie have
never been honoured as the former fighters for
gender, sexual and racial minorities.”
"The early 1980s marked the full fledged anti-
prostitution crusade to purge sex workers from
the WE. Davie sex workers built the foundation of
what would become this city’s first Gay-
neighbourhood, and yet hookers on Davie have
never been honoured as the former fighters for
gender, sexual and racial minorities.”
Though I hesitate to “correct”
a sociology expert on the topic, my understanding of the background to the WE’s
gay culture is that it goes way back to nearly a century ago. I doubt that
these prostitutes—and I insist on calling a spade a spade—laid that foundation.
Ross will have to persuade me of that.
Maybe, just maybe, more on
the subject next time. I will try….
Labels:
apology,
Hamilton Jamies Lee,
hotels,
hymn singing,
In-out of Nigeria,
Jesus,
memorial,
New Testament,
Nigeria,
prostitution,
Ross Becki,
Vancouver,
West End
Monday, 3 October 2016
Post 129 –Calvin Helin’s Aboriginal Critique and Solution
Back in Post 123 on August
30, I wrote about Calvin Helin, to whom I referred as one hell of an Aboriginal
whom I really want to meet some day. I
sort of half promised that I would one day give you a few summaries from the
book he wrote, Dances with Dependency. It
is the most honest and most brutal book about Aboriginals I have ever read—and
Helin is an Aboriginal. His stuff is from the inside, from the cradle of his
own people.
So, here’s the very first paragraph
of text from the Preface, the opening salvo, if you like:
The purpose of this book is
to look at practical ways to move indigenous populations forward. Money has
been liberally thrown at Indian problems with nominal impact. Neither
mainstream nor indigenous politics has had lasting widespread impact on
improving the lives of ordinary indigenous folk, no matter how many hyped
political announcements and other solutions have been touted. It is time to
look at the problems and issues at the broadest level in order to seek general
solutions that might be tailored to the different circumstances of Tribes now.
I expect every person of
goodwill will shout an affirmative “Amen!” to this opening salvo. “Money
liberally thrown” with little impact—that sounds like the sad case of
Vancouver’s Down Town East Side, where a million is being spent every day with little or no impact over
the years.
Moving on to p. 25, after he
gives a short vivid description of the traditional and comparatively
sophisticated economics and politics of his people along the coast of British
Columbia, he writes:
My father was a commercial
fisherman and a fine one. Though he had made a good life for our family, I was
well aware that life in an Aboriginal Indian reserve had a very sinister side
to it. Such a bad environment has persisted so long in most Aboriginal communities
that many Aboriginal people have, over
generations, been socialized into thinking that this widespread dysfunction is
normal. Imagine a situation where tragically high youth suicide rates, gross
unemployment figures, frequent banana republic-style corruption, and persistent
abuse—both substance and physical—prevail, and you might begin to understand
what life is like on many Aboriginal reserves.
Towards the end of Chapter
1, Helin presents us with a general journey that Aboriginals must embark upon
with the concrete details worked out in the rest of his book. Here are some of
his phrases and statements from pp. 36 and 39:
“Aboriginal citizens
must…squarely face the Industry of Non-Aboriginal Hucksters, and ‘consultants,’
and those Aboriginal politicians who are openly profiting from this sea of
despair and poverty. In spite of what they say, this ‘Indian Industry’ has no
real interest in changing a system from which they are profiting.”
“the unkind hands of the
welfare trap.”
Families are falling “as casualties
of a fatal ‘welfare syndrome’—one that is literally stealing the lives and
hopes of our future generation….”
“We must shake off the
apathy of what has become an all too comfortable ‘cloak of welfare’….”
With reference to the economic
opportunities available to his people, he writes, “To exploit these
opportunities will require a fundamental change in the dependency mindset of
Aboriginal people. For lasting solutions, decisions have to come from
Aboriginal people themselves. Aboriginals have to consciously choose a more
beneficial path than the dependency course they are currently on—and have the
conviction to live with the consequences.”
The pursuit of economic
opportunities before them, “could lead to the Holy Grail of rediscovered
independence and self-reliance. It is time to re-take control of our lives from
government departments, bureaucrats and the Indian Industry.”
Well, if you think the above
sentiments and observations are racist, coming as they do at this point from a
Caucasian writer, you’ll have to take it up with Helin himself, a man with all
of his roots deeply entangled with Aboriginal history and culture—and, I should
emphasize, full of passionate love for his
people. I suppose you could push this a bit farther by saying that my
choosing to quote all this and bring it to a wider public is racist. Well, go ahead, if that makes you feel better.
I have long been concerned
with the state of the Aboriginal people in Canada. In fact, when I first
returned to Canada as a “retired” person after 43 years, I actually hoped to do
a serious study on the subject and publish its result. Because of my life’s
work, I ended up focusing on Islam and wrote a series of eight books along with
quite a number of articles on that subject, all of which are available to you
free of charge on the Islamica page of my website < SocialTheology.com.>
So, I never got around to Aboriginal issues, but I have a large archive of
Aboriginal articles collected for that purpose. If any reader is interested in
that archival material, contact me. I am prepared to donate them it of charge
to any party who is seriously involved in Aboriginal affairs, especially Aboriginals
themselves, even more especially to Helin, who has become a hero of mine. If
any reader knows him, please draw his attention to my offer and to these posts
in this blog.
Labels:
"Indian Industry",
Aborginals,
abuse,
archive,
corruption,
dependency,
Helin Calvin,
racism,
reserve,
welfare
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)